| Featured Article |
NOTES FROM BIG BENBy Peter Guest
Money, Money, Money But is it really true anymore? When cities first got involved in parking, I guess that it was "for the public good" - like drains and street lighting, to keep the streets tidy. Indeed, the first parking controls were to limit time and place without charging. However, it quickly became apparent that the easiest way to do this was by charging a few cents, and so along came the parking meter. Of course, once money got involved, it became a business, and it is no coincidence that the two founders of NCP, the UK's biggest parking company, are on the UK's "Rich List." The question is, given that there is a fully functional commercial industry out there, why should city councils still operate what should be a commercial undertaking in a non-commercial way? OK, maybe neighborhood parking for local residents is different, but why should the business district parking lot or street meter be looked at any differently from the lot operated by, say, Central Parking? I would welcome your views on this.
Order or Chaos: Take Your Pick The most serious situation seems to be in Leeds. Activists have for many years argued that many if not all of the tickets issued in Leeds were invalid because the city's regulations signs and markings were a total mess. This made the local television news when even the government wrote to the city and warned that the situation was so bad that continued enforcement could amount to fraud or extortion. The city has, it seems, decided that there really is not a problem. A motorist has formally reported the city enforcement officers to the police for alleged criminal activity. Could the first person to go to jail for a parking ticket be the guy who wrote it, not the guy who got it?
Self-Enforcing Trees
Finally ... Peter Guest is Parking Today's correspondent in Europe and the Middle East. He can be reached at peterguestparking@hotmail.co.uk. |
