What’s your “Parking Philosophy”

We embrace technology. Research and innovation have given us everything we need to run our parking operations. But are we better off?  In some ways, of course. We can collect money in many different forms, get reports on what is going on in our garages and on our streets, and we can use that information to better market our product. But do we?

How many cities, universities, commercial parking operations, airports, venues and the like simply purchase the ‘latest and greatest’ technology, install it, and then sit back and let their parking money flow in. In each of those cases, how many actually thought about what they were trying to accomplish, not just with the parking technology, but with their parking product itself.

At Texas A and M, arguably the most technological advanced higher ed parking operation on the planet, Peter Lange has built an organization that markets a product, and uses the technology to that end.

He and his staff believe that they are there to serve their customers, and go out of their way to make that happen. They have half a dozen ways to let people into and out of their parking facilities. They collect money any way the parker wants. They have a database of information that is at their beck and call so they can assist any customer with any problem, issue, or desire. Sure the technology allows them to do that, but they needed to understand their mission and their goals before putting the the technology in place.

In addition, they needed to be able to ‘adjust’ their technology to fit new requirements that may not have even been considered when they began their project. To do that they had to not only work with their vendors, but also have in house programmers to help them develop systems to fit their particular needs.

The problem with most technology is that no matter how flexible it seems, the day after you install it, someone will want something it can ‘t do. You end up fitting your parking program to the technology you own. Sigh.

Of course you can’t think of everything up front. But you need to understand that having a camera in your iPhone doesn’t mean you can make Gone with the Wind. We need to understand our limitations.

By the same token, many innovations can be done without little or no application of silicon and electrons.  A and M’s Theater had a problem. They couldn’t figure out how to collect for parking; prepay, post pay, collect at the gate it was chaos. Peter suggested they charge every patron $2 additional for their ticket and give the money to the parking operation. Parking would then appear to be ‘free’ to the customer. Problem solved, and not a bit of technology in sight.

Technology is important, but first you have to understand what you are trying to accomplish and then be sure the technology you use gets you to that goal.

JVH

Social Share Toolbar
Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to What’s your “Parking Philosophy”

  1. Harnadi Hidayat says:

    I understand your reluctance to adopt new invention because,
    >>The problem with most technology is that no matter how flexible it seems, the day after you install it, someone will want something it can ‘t do. You end up fitting your parking program to the technology you own. Sigh.<Basically, (automated) automobile garage parking systems can be said to work by moving emptied cars from the place where drivers and passengers alight to designated parking places in the parking structure. Parking in the designated parking spots requires moving the automobile in only two ways, vertical and horizontal.

    “In general practice, vertical movement is achieved using a lift (elevator) and horzontal movement achieved with a slider (sliding gear). The problem that arises is how to move the automobile into the lift and move it again to mount the sliding gear, and finally from the sliding gear to the parking place.

    “Up to now, all parking systems employ pallets or tray, upon which the automobile is placed for movement into the lift, slider, and on which it resides while parked and until returned to the driver, who drives it off the pallet and away. This method limits parking system capacity – horizontal movement is limited and requires close proximity to the lift. This results in a relatively small overall parking structure capacity per lift employed; and, large capacity structures like the Hoboken Parking Facility, Hoboken New Jersey, or the Wohr 730 facility in Budapest are limited to to servicing low traffic frequency demand situations (such as residential or office parking) and that itself demands expensive, high frequency maintenance regimes, causing high overall operating budgets.

    “If we could only move and store automobiles without using (persistant) pallets but rather employ a simple (multidirectional) moving device that slips under the automobile and simultaneously lifts the four wheels, and thus the entire car, that system would facilitate cheap, high density parking with an inexpensive maintenance regime because the slider and lift can be used continuously, 24/7 (obviating the need for a pallet that stays with each parked car) and <- ) before the trolley system introduced. But this system is not solving all the problem because the trolley cannot move the car side ways, therefore need a big tray and cut the capacity of the garages and some other drawbacks.

  2. Harnadi Hidayat says:

    PS,
    sorry my last comment is very long and narrowly focused on ‘technical side’ of parking business. Of course my invention will need some other ‘helping hands’ to be able to play a role in parking business. What I’m doing recently is only trying to attract some ‘lenient’ helping hands. Thank you

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>