In Beaverton, Oregon, residents are ticked off because construction at a Nike facility has caused an employee parking shortage that’s effecting their neighborhood. People are so annoyed they are asking Nike to provide shuttles for its staff and are talking about asking the city to apply parking permits to the area, reports kgw.com.
Longtime resident Ray Lee said there are a few other factors that have added to the problems, including high density housing nearby and their street being made into a throughway. But Nike employees traveling though and parking at the curb is making it a lot worse.
What’s mind boggling to me is that residents would even consider a permit parking as a solution to this temporary problem. Nike’s expansion won’t last forever, and when it’s finished, parking in the surrounding area will go back to normal. However, permit parking would continue and it’s a hassle for everyone. I’m not there, so I don’t know what it’s really like, but I think these people might need to relax a little. Sure, it’s not happening on my street, but other things that bug me are – every day. Life is consistently inconvenient. Read the article here.
For a little perspective on a real parking problem, consider the 30-year wait list for a parking space at Seward Park Cooperatives on the Lower East Side of Manhattan. According to ny1.com, there are people on the waiting list for parking at the co-op who will probably die before they ever get a spot. Changes to parking policy at the co-op have upset some residents, but the changes don’t include a reduction in the wait time or the length of the waiting list.
The new capacity is not expected to dent the 30-year wait because many young families with cars have been moving in. The wait list now has 670 names.
Waiting 30 years for a parking space seems a lot more dire than a few months of congestion, but people are easily annoyed and news outlets are ready and eager to make a minor issue into a front page headline. Read the rest of the article here.
I am humbled and amazed. ParkPlus Systems, the result of the City of Calgary’s step into on street parking enforcement, has developed a list of the top people to follow on parking in social media and a list of the top organizations in our industry.
Parking Today and yours truly was honored to be on both lists. Its a pretty heady group including Don Shoup, Mike Civitelli, the UK’s Manny Rasores, Singapore’s Paul Barter, and our own Kathleen Laney.
It seems there is an app called “Little Bird” and it uses twitter as a base and then determines activity based on followers and other black arts. Obviously I won’t be arguing with the list.
I copied the ‘top 10″ below but if you want to see the entire top 100, go here.
Strangely I’m speechless.
10 Top People to follow on Parking
|jvhpt||John Van Horn|
|MrParking||Manny Rasores de Toro|
|gmeansparking||Gary A. Means|
10 Top Organizations to follow on Parking
|IntlParkingInst||International Parking Institute|
|WeAreParking||National Parking Association|
|BritishParking||British Parking Association|
Travelers to London have a new and exciting option for accommodations: and Airbnb listed at just $11 per night. The catch? It’s in a parking spot. The vacation rental offers a bed and bedside table in an unused parking area, reports foxnews.com.
The bed and furniture are all located in an uncovered, concrete parking lot outside the listing owner’s garage. Unlike some cramped hotel quarters, at least there’s plenty of room to move around.
Sadly, the listing was removed from Airbnb for not meeting its standards for occupancy – namely, plumbing, a roof and four walls. The article says there are other vacation rentals at that price in London that come with four walls and plumbing for those who don’t mind sleeping on a couch.
I don’t want to spend the night in a parking lot, but I have no doubt there are plenty who would be just fine with the experience. Airbnb needs a section for unorthodox arrangements.
Read the article here.
An Austin, Texas woman says her credit card numbers were stolen after she used downtown parking meters, reports keyetv.com. The woman, Chelsea, who did not give her last name, says fraudulent charges were made on two of her cards. City officials examined the meters she used and said there was no sign of skimming.
However, it is possible to skim with a wireless device from nearby.
“They are wireless and they do transmit the data so when you put your card in, it needs to go through an authorization process, and I would imagine that some of that data that can be transferred electronically can be captured locally within a reasonable distance,” says Allan Bachman, Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Education Manager.
I don’t like to be the voice of doom, but in this area, I will admit to serious doubts about the safety of credit and debit card information in just about every setting. I’ve had my card information stolen at least twice in my life. I use my cards with the full knowledge that they are not safe, but do so because I know the credit card company will reimburse me if fraudulent charges are made.
I’ve read that gas stations are hit most by card skimmers. When I buy gas, I use the card that comes with the best fraud policy and customer service – just in case.
At some point, credit card companies are going to lose too much money to continue this practice. They will either reimburse less, require insurance or limit use in a way that is more secure than current PCI standards. In the meantime, anybody designing meters might want to factor in some extra security measures.
Read the article here.
Scroll down to see my blog, then comments from readers, then Paul chimes in.
I couldn’t help add my two cents to the discussion about the end of the parking meter. All the technology for this transition is available, but a huge component in the parking process isn’t ready for the shift: the municipal government and the user.
According to global.handelsblatt.com, the end of cash is closer than the end of the meter. The website reports that Sweden is at the head of the cashless society movement in Europe, with well-known former-ABBA band member Björn Ulvaeus championing the cause by going an entire year without using cash. Just about the entire country is set up for cashless living.
“We prefer credit cards” is written in large letters on signs in many Swedish supermarkets. The Stockholm Public Transportation Company no longer accepts cash payments, and even newspapers or a few bread rolls can be paid for with debit or credit cards or by mobile phone. And parking meters were switched to a cashless payment system a few years ago.
Read the article here.
It would be easy to expect the fall of the parking meter in a place where pretty much everyone expects to pay electronically. But I think credit card capabilities will keep the meter from reaching obsolescence for a long time even if people stop using cash. It’s only when mobile phone payments become the norm that machinery for accepting parking payments can be eliminated all together.
In the United States, our emphasis on state and local governments will also lengthen the life of the parking meter. It might be easy to implement a country-wide parking policy in Sweden, but it won’t be simple here. I can see a state like California or New York going cashless years ahead of other states. While they are tearing out meters, places like Phoenix, Ariz. will still be installing them. They’re installing new meters in Phoenix just this month, reports downtowndevil.com.
The 180 parking meters were requested by both Roosevelt Row Merchants Association and the Evans-Churchill Neighborhood Association through their commissioned non-governmental parking committee.The 180 parking meters were requested by both Roosevelt Row Merchants Association and the Evans-Churchill Neighborhood Association through their commissioned non-governmental parking committee.
I’m not against a cashless society or mobile-phone payments, but I think it’s most realistic to expect these changes to come about when the Millenial generation reaches middle age. Those who are used to carrying cash will want to do so for many years to come. And they will all need to park and have a way to pay for their parking.
Read the article here.
I received a number of comments on my post yesterday about Pay by Cell. I thought I would bring them out of the ‘comments’ section and into the light of day. JVH
Here in the UK phone parking started over 12 years ago and although we now have many thousands of locations after all this time, these systems are offered by companies not able or willing to provide and share a common central data bank to enable consumers to have one app or one common phone number and this continue to hold back their expansion.
Parknews.biz led off this morning with that headline. We all know where pay phones went. But parking meters? Not so much
Consider the pay phone. It was what you used when you weren’t at home or at the office. There were convenient boxes on street corners that you could go into, close the door, insert you coin and make your call. Superman was happy to have so many changing rooms. Can you find one today? Where did they go?
Telephone companies realized that replacing and upgrading pay phones was a business downer. They had a full on replacement with the cellphone. Everyone, literally EVERYONE has one, or more. Why would I want to search for a pay phone when I have one in my pocket.
How about parking meters. Well…. Pay by phone companies tout their services, and frankly its coming. But not as fast as any would hope. If 30% of the transactions (read that people who put money in the meters) are pay by phone, its a big number. What do the other 70% do.
Unfortunately the headline writer didn’t care much for reality, but simply was going for a hook to bring in readers. Oh, yes, in a decade or so, smart phones will replace most everything. But in the meantime, T2, IPS, Parkeon, Metric and the rest need not lose a lot of sleep.
The Pay by Phone companies need to come up with a way to cross city boundaries, like the phone company does. If I want to pay by phone in LA, and then in Beverly Hills, and then in Santa Monica and then in Burbank (not that unusual in our fair metroplex) I really don’t want to use four different apps to do that. There are a number of phone companies, but I can call any phone hosted by any company.
Much to the chagrin of some pay by phone companies, in a number of countries in Eastern Europe, the telephone company handles these charges. It goes on your phone bill. No need to sign up with numerous apps.
I also might recommend that the pay by phone companies make it easier to sign up. Let’s say I go to park and want to pay by phone. I have not signed up yet. Its a monstrous task to do so on you smart phone. Enter all that data and then a 15 digit number. Skip it. Why not let a person park without an upfront charge for the first time, have them sign up on line at home, and then charge them when they sign up. If they don’t, their ticket stands and they have to pay it.
I would much rather complete a sign up process at my desk than when sitting in my car late for a meeting.
Pay by phone is coming. But its still a tad clunky. We are all not 14 year old computer nerds…Sometimes its nice just to go somewhere and put in a quarter or stick in your AMEX.
There’s no debating people like free parking better than paid parking. No polls need to be conducted, no questionnaires are required. People want free parking, but it’s not completely up to them. Their only leverage in the matter is their patronage. In Medford, Massachusetts, residents don’t want to pay for parking, but they must, and a year after the installation of parking kiosks in downtown areas, they’re still complaining, reports medford.wickedlocal.com.
Some local business owners have reported an increase in available parking has increased their sales; others say they are losing customers. Residents have a very specific complaint: they don’t like the kiosks.
“Standing in line behind somebody for 5 to 10 minutes [to pay] is just ridiculous,” resident Jaime Cheah said. “As a parent who doesn’t have a ton of time, you’re going to have to make it appealing for me to shop in Medford if you want to spend money in Medford. It doesn’t help that Assembly Row is five minutes away by car and has a plethora of free parking, and everything is right there.
It’s true, kiosks do get backed up. I’ve waited in line at kiosks, scratched my head trying to figure out how to use kiosks, faced the conundrum of the non-functioning kiosk, and played the not fun game of hide-and-seek with kiosks.
Still, I understand the economy of the kiosk – cheaper than 50 meters and less of an eyesore, too. But the feedback is worth taking into consideration.
Read the article here.
The Parking Industry has been a tad panicked over driverless cars. OMG – Once they take over, there will be no need for onstreet parking, certainly much fewer off street spaces (With Lyft and Uber leading the way.) and who knows what other disasters are lurking around their software driven innards.
Stephen Hill, writing at the Observer, has given us a reality check. To wit:
Despite how much Uber CEO Travis Kalanick likes to crow about our “driverless future,” outside of The Jetsons this one is…not…happening…soon. Besides the remaining technological challenges, the liability and regulatory issues involved in letting a 3,000-pound death machine steer itself with no human at the controls are huge.
You can read the entire article here.
He goes on:
Not surprisingly, a survey by IEEE, a technical professional organization dedicated to advancing technology for humanity, of more than 200 experts in the field of autonomous vehicles found that of six possible roadblocks to the mass adoption of driverless vehicles, the three biggest obstacles are legal liability, policymakers and consumer acceptance. Cost, infrastructure and technology were seen as the least of the problems.
Consider the questions the insurance companies must ask. In the event of an accident who is to blame? The vehicles owner? He wasn’t driving. The manufacturer? The company that wrote the software? What company is going to take on that kind of risk? All it takes is a tiny software bug and BAM, you have bought the farm.
Consider the fact that when we drive we make thousands of little decisions each trip. Most are unconscious, but some brush up against the law, and even break it. What about driving over a double yellow line to go around a double parked UPS truck? How many times have you broken that little law and done so in perfect safety?
Who is going to accept responsibly for a self driving vehicle that was programmed to break the law? Is the car just going to sit there while UPS decides which package goes where? Let your mind wander. There are tons of situations where we make perfectly reasonable decisions to break driving laws. Can a self driving vehicle do that?
Audi says totally self driving cars are 20-30 years away. Most predict that they will be most reliable on interstates and most likely be self driving semi’s. I’m sure the Teamsters will have something to say about that.
The devil is in the details. And the details surrounding self driving vehicles go far beyond the technology issues. The press, Elon Musk, Google, Uber, and BMW may think they are on the cusp, but those pesky details will slow this giant leap for mankind